This post is focused on technical development to support research projects in humanities and related disciplines.
See Job Advert
The Digital Humanities team at the University of Warwick are expanding and have a new position for a skilled and motivated programmer/developer to contribute to innovative research projects, mainly in the Arts Faculty. Working in a small team, you will contribute to varied technology enabled projects spanning the range of humanities disciplines.
You will lead the development and management of a small number of strategically important service offerings that are crucial for digital humanities work. This will be realised through the design and implementation of robust, reusable, supported and sustainable technological solutions. The utilisation of and coordination with IT Services infrastructure will be key to achieving this.
You will have experience with the full stack of web applications and, in particular, demonstrable skills in the management of production web application environments, the prudent use of open source libraries/plugins to extend functionality and ability to code with PHP, Ruby, node.js or python in appropriate design patterns. We are currently developing expertise around Omeka and Drupal, so experience with those packages is particularly welcome.
This is a challenging and exciting role in a burgeoning area on the intersection of technology and humanities research. You will work directly with academics throughout the whole project lifecycle and will very tangibly contribute to Warwick’s research excellence.
Closing date 8th January 2016.
By the way, if this sounds up your street but you’re more interested in part time contracting, contact us. We’re always looking for talent.
Back in June I shared details of project post we were recruiting for, and now I’m pleased to report progress on that AND two new vacancies!
The project to develop Technology Enhanced Learning for the Warwick Monash Alliance is now underway. We have been joined by Ross MacKenzie and Dot Powell for 18 months to deliver the activities in this project.
We’re now recruiting again, and we have two posts available. Both are Grade 5 £24,775-£27,864 per annum. They are Academic Technology Officer roles. Think digital skills, e-learning, user support, education and technology. Academic technology is a great field to work in, and there’s plenty of interesting work to do.
One is an 18 month project post to work with Ross and Dot on the Alliance TEL Project. Academic Technology Officer, See Advert for 76718-105.
One is a permanent service post to work with Jim Judges, Richard Clay, Russ Boyatt, Samuel Moulem and the rest of the Academic Technology team, supporting the university in its effective use of technology enhanced learning tools. Academic Technology Officer, Grade 5. See Advert for 76802-105
They require similar skills but are slightly different types of work. The permanent post is about providing specialist user support to an established service, whereas the 18 month project post is more about getting new things started. They’ll suit different people with similar skills but if you’re not sure what suits you you are very welcome to apply for both. We’re a friendly and expert team and these are both great roles.
The closing date for both posts is 4th November and interviews will be on the 16th or 17th November.
Please do email me if you’d like any further information. I’d love to hear from potential applicants!
Time flies, it’s over 6 months since my last post, when I posted on what it means to be a learning technologist.
I’m now pleased to announce a new post we’re currently recruiting for.
Warwick has an Alliance with Monash University in Melbourne, Australia. We have agreed an Alliance Education Strategy that will draw on the strengths of both partners to further enhance teaching, learning and the student experience at both sites.
We’re looking for a Senior Academic Technologist TEL specialist to manage several projects and ensure that the technology enhanced learning (TEL) aspects of the plan are in place. It is a full time 18 month post and will be an interesting and varied role. You will be a part of the Academic Technology team in IT Services and we are recruiting two other roles to work alongside you.
Responsibilities will include supporting online lectures and online classes, supporting the development of a teaching materials repository, and advising on the redesign of course materials for online delivery. This is a great opportunity for someone with a range of TEL skills looking to make an impact on a high profile project.
The closing date is 10th July. Interviews are likely to be 20th or 22nd July.
You are very welcome to contact me with questions, on amber (dot) thomas (at) warwick (dot) ac (dot) uk.
There have been discussions on blogs and ALT members mailing list recently about what makes a learning technologist. For the record, my job title is Service Owner: Academic Technology, which means I’m a manager of an elearning team in IT Services that runs the platforms/tools as well as supports people using them in effective ways.
I’m feeling a bit outside the frame of the discussion about learning technologies, because:
- I work in IT services, because that’s the way we’re organised here, and I often hear learning technologists refer to IT Services as “them”
- I’m not an academic or a teacher and I’m certainly not a “pedagogue”
If that’s what characterises learning technologists then perhaps I’m not one?
What I *am* interested in is:
- the place of digital technology in the student experience
- solutions development and architectures that support the workflows of academics and students
- the way that organisational cultures and individuals’ practices change
- what the web means to the creation and sharing of knowledge
I’d like to think that in my 15 years+ in the field I’ve developed some expertise in some of that. I don’t have a templated answer to any situation, I have an accumulated pot of knowledge and approaches that I apply (with varying success!!).
I see the occasional moan on the ALT members list about the senior managers who write their strategies and spend their money and don’t understand how the world is changing. That’s not my experience at all. I hear plenty of interest and passion from our senior team. We’ve just had endorsement of the Technology Enhanced Learning Strategy that we’ve developed, through the TEL Steering group that I chair, and there was plenty of recognition of the importance of TEL.
I think what some people are experiencing is a shift in the point of engagement and the type of support offered by a central learning technologist team, or a departmental elearning lead. Here’s what I mean, with some examples of the types of activity in each zone (this is absolutely not comprehensive):
With a very broad brush, I’d characterise it broadly as follows. From the mid 90s to the mid 00s, there was an emphasis on the bottom left hand corner and it favoured the skillset and mindset of the crafters. There were some great crafters who worked at Becta 15 years ago who were a good fit to the needs then, and have since left educational technology to do other crafting things. The approaches of working with individual academics also became richer, filling up the left hand column. People with great interpersonal skills and curiosity came to the fore. In parallel over the last 15 years or so we’ve had the maturing integration of platforms so that there are some learning technologists dedicated to the IT side of things but they are still driven by the values of teaching and learning. And there are managers like me who, hopefully, know enough about the tools and the practices to try to ensure that university level provision is good.
Incidentally, parts of my team also support research, and I anticipate a growth in types of research technologists. Maybe it is following a similar pattern.
I don’t think it’s just that the content development is being absorbed by academics, I think there’s more to it. In fact I suggest that in addition to the classic learning technologist, and the TEL-skilled academic, there are already several other flavours of learning technologist in my own university:
- the staff developers and educational developers who are comfortable with learning technologies
- the learning technologist systems analyst/architect
- the student experience manager, also comfortable with technology: it’s not their job but it is part of their skillset and mindset
- the orchestrator who might be a group/departmental administrator or a programme lead, they are at ease with technologies and know how to use them when
- the content developer (they might be in the library, student skills, webteam) – they have learning technologist skills but wouldn’t call themselves that
- the researcher/technologist who has half a foot in implementation and half in research – they pay more attention to evidence and theory than their IT colleagues, even when they’re doing similar things – skillset might be similar but the mindset is different
I’m sure there are more. Do I want to draw a clear line between them and the classic learning technologist? No, why sweat it? It’s great that so many people are engaged with the effective use of technology in education.
And another thing: I’m not an academic and I don’t teach. I consider myself to be a para-academic. (Like a paralegal, or a paramedic😉 ). I have a particular skillset which has a place in universities. I’ve lost count of the number of sessions I’ve been in at elearning conferences over the year where the presenter asks “how many people in the room actually teach?”. Cue a few hands raised and the majority looking down at their feet, embarrassed, as if the 5/10/15 years experience in education counts for nowt. Universities are multi-professional places and learning technologists, in all their flavours, have a rightful place at the table. People like me shouldn’t have to pretend to be something we’re not.
Hopefully this post gives a voice to other learning technologists who feel like they don’t fit the standard description.
I too am a big advocate of openness, of open source, of open practice. I think the world wide web is changing the nature of knowledge, I think scholarship needs to evolve. I love the narratives of Catherine Cronin and Audrey Watters. And I am also very proud of what my colleagues are doing with our Moodle. I’m excited about the challenge of creating a consistent, quality, trusted environment that meet student’s “transactional” needs, that provides for the “hygiene” factors. If nothing “transformational” or pedagogically innovative took place it would still not be wasted time.
I know from my own student experience that there are all sorts of anxieties and hassles that can distract from the hard work of learning. As Rob O’Toole would put it: “extraneous cognitive load”. Cutting down on confusion is important. And also I know that there are questions that students help each other with: “when is it due in? how do I know which lab session to go to? did anyone else understand that critique?”. I was lucky, I was a very sociable student, and confident enough to ask the lecturer anything. Many were not, and those that didn’t go out for the post-lecture coffee chat (for reasons of money, or childcare, or culture, or shyness), were surely disadvantaged. We owe it to all our students to provide them with good information about their modules and provide forums for additional information to be exchanged. As David Davies said to me, it’s an inclusion issue.
Outside the university I use online systems to do important necessary things: banking, paying my kids’ school dinners, sorting out my car’s task disc. They just help me do what I need to do and they don’t have to make me feel “wow”.
VLEs can be used as a platform for fantastic blended and online learning, but even if they are not used to that extent, they are still important. VLEs exist for a reason. I’ve had this conversation very recently and had started to wonder if I was out of sync with other educational technology people, so it is reassuring to see this anti-anti-VLE perspective surfacing.
As D’Arcy Norman puts it: “We have a responsibility to provide a high quality environment to every single instructor and student, and the LMS is still the best way to do that”.
Readers of this blog who didn’t know me before Warwick won’t know that at times I have been obsessed with openly-licensed content.
Tonight I gave in to the urge to blog, in response to a mailing list discussion.
Despite the lack of posts on this blog, I have actually been very VERY VERY busy doing lots of interesting stuff.
I’ve just posted over on our team digital humanities blog about some sessions I’m planning on crowdsourcing and citizen science. I give a heads-up for Transcribe Bentham and the brilliantly-named Treezilla project. Lots of more examples to explore at the sessions, and perhaps some blog posts to follow.
Excuse the cringeworthy neologism, I can’t resist it.
So, yes, we have a new website thanks to the design flair of Richard Clay.
It’s coming up to the anniversary of me starting at Warwick and I’m in a reflective mood. Perhaps I’ll treat myself to a bit of blogging soon🙂
Fantastic report out now exploring the potential of ebooks in academic institutions:
What makes this report unique, I think, is that is pulls together the challenges in libraries, e-learning and self publishing. Each of those domains is debating a slightly different set of concerns, and what this report does is synthesise them across three themes: creation, curation and consumption.
This is one of the projects I set up when I was at JISC. I worked with Ken Chad and his expert team to scope this guidance. They undertook literature reviews, case studies, interviews and focus groups. From the start I steered that there should be engaging visual outputs rather than detailed text: what was required was to develop a view across the whole space. They took that challenge and ran with it. We chose the rainbow to represent the promise of ebooks, and then the team distilled the key challenges and decisions beneath them. The infographics look great and the site works well on a mobile too. Excellent!
I plan to arrange an ebooks discussion with Warwick colleagues so that we can consider how we best respond to the opportunities that ebooks offer.